Of course we cannot and will not ignore ICANN.,. After all, out plan is to copy the ICANN ROOT, and augment it into being our superior Inclusive Root, to be offered as a solid well managed ROOT service to ISP's that want and need such a service. We should also offer it to the ccTLD operators who are being squeezed into ICANN compliance by bad service delivery to ICANN agreement non-signers. In fact lets work on ways to address a proposal to them to join us in lieu of ICANN. But first, lets get our own act together;-)... Cheers...\Stef At 00:05 +0200 11/09/01, Marc Schneiders wrote: [SNIP]... [SNIP]... [SNIP]... [SNIP]... [SNIP]... [SNIP]... [SNIP] > >I am all for alternatives, especially working ones, and I do try to >participate in those. But can we really _ignore_ ICANN completely?
- [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Richard J. Sexton
