>> We need to find our own solution to the new TLD problem, and the
>> cooperative maintenance of the Virtual Inclusive Root.
>
>Burying your head in the sand and wishing the problem away won't make it
>so.
>
>Ignore ICANN to your own detriment.
Perhaps, but saying "these ISO protocols suck and should not be used"
was not effective. Making TCP/IP work, was.
--
"But at the end of the day, even if you put a calico dress on
it and call it Florence, a pig is still a pig."
-- Bradshaw v. Unity Marine Corp. et al., 2001 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 8962, (S. D. Tex., 2001).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
