I've also had bad luck with SSDs on a Supermicro Atom. If you have access
to the hardware, SSD is not a bad option.


On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Aaron C. de Bruyn <aa...@heyaaron.com>wrote:

> Just a note of personal experience.  I've deployed ~20 pfSense firewalls
> that had SSDs (both cheap and rated 'good' from Newegg) over the past 2
> years.  I am not convinced SSDs are more reliable.  Nearly every one has
> had an SSD die or become corrupt.  We switched them all to USB sticks and
> haven't had any more issues.  Plus it's easier for us to ship a replacement
> USB stick to the client and have them plug it in than to have them pop open
> the case and replace the drive.
>
> Maybe we've just had bad luck with SSDs, but I'm not convinced they are
> ready.
>
> -A
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Eugen Leitl <eu...@leitl.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 12:40:34AM +0100, Chris Bagnall wrote:
>>
>> > Which brings me to the question: the last time I performed a pfSense
>> > 'full' install (i.e. not embedded) was several years, and many
>> > versions ago. What's the best practice when using an SSD? Use the
>> > CD-based installer to do a 'full' install, or continue to use the
>> > embedded NanoBSD image?
>>
>> Modern SSDs are at least as reliable as HDs. I've used SSDs
>> with pfSense for years (including IDE DoMs) with full install
>> and never had a failure yet.
>>
>> > As an aside, there are several options on the "Advanced" tab
>> > relating to NIC performance options:
>> > - Disable hardware checksum offload
>> > - Disable hardware TCP segmentation offload
>> > - Disable hardware large receive offload
>> > Has anyone done any tests / is there a list maintained anywhere with
>>
>> > details of which NICs are "problematic" with these, and hence should
>> > be disabled? The motherboard I'm using is a mix of Intel and Realtek
>> > gigabit NICs (em and re respectively).
>>
>> I've used Supermicro Atoms with 2 Intel NICs onboard and
>> with a dual-port Intel NIC added. I would be also interested in
>> suggested list of settings for Intel NICs.
>> _______________________________________________
>> List mailing list
>> List@lists.pfsense.org
>> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> List@lists.pfsense.org
> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>
>
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to