::applause:: I may have fired off the message in a fit of frustration but you made it a public statement - if you wanted to be the “mom” and handle it you should have sent it privately instead of publicly.
— Ryan On Jul 22, 2014, at 21:15, Chris Bagnall <pfse...@lists.minotaur.cc> wrote: > On 23/7/14 2:10 am, Jim Thompson wrote: >> Very little if this thread is related to pfSense. >> Please stay on topic. > > Respectfully, I disagree. > > Given the APU is - as the de facto successor to the ALIX - likely to be a > piece of hardware used in a lot of new pfSense installs, discussion about its > merits and drawbacks (in a pfSense context) strikes me as being *entirely* on > topic. > > Certainly if heat dissipation is going to be a concern with this unit in > long-term deployments, and given the 24/7/365 nature of firewalls, that's > very relevant to pfSense and something for which we as a community need to be > finding solutions. > > Kind regards, > > Chris > -- > This email is made from 100% recycled electrons > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > List@lists.pfsense.org > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list _______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
