Having over 1300 miles on the PMG-132 in a light(er) bike aprox.
440lbs and a <200lb rider I find the heat generated in the motor to be
controllable with the small fans and shroud I made. Where am I going
with this, oh yeah. If I were trying to build a bike based on a
heavier frame I would opt for a larger motor, like a D&D or if you
have deeper pockets one of the smaller Warps or  a custom motor from
JH versus a dual Etek or Dual PMG (2 PMGs will set you back roughly
$1600 so why not do the series wound and have the thermal mass to
handle the required power dissipation under acceleration).

Jeff

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:04 AM, SteveS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get the idea of the two motor system, but how does compare to using a
> larger single motor? I imagine a single larger motor would be easier to
> install and control. The larger motor would deal with the low speed torque
> need, but I wonder about what happens when you get up to speed? Would a
> larger motor be less efficient?
>
>  - SteveS
>
>  dale henderson wrote:
>
> > The advantage of a transmission is more power at low speeds while at the
> same time reducing the power needed. But once you are up to a cruising speed
> the transmission does not any help except for allowing the motors to operate
> at high efficiency at more than one speed. The disadvantages of a
> transmission are increased drag, or lower overall efficiency and increased
> weight.
> > The advantage of a two motor system is that a second motor is often, if
> not always, lighter, smaller, simpler and more efficient than a
> transmission. The disadvantage of a two motor system is increased power
> requirement.
> > Here is another way to look at it: if your main concern is high efficiency
> at a particular cursing speed [e.g. highway travel] then longer you travel
> the less efficient a transmission becomes and conversely the more efficient
> a two motor system becomes. A transmission only increases efficiency during
> acceleration once you are at a steady speed the transmission reduces
> efficiency in terms of drag and weight. While a two motor system is only
> less efficient during acceleration, so if you have little acceleration and a
> lot of steady speed then two motor system is overall more efficient.
> > Here is a very simple model; if it gives good results then a closer
> examination would be warranted: take a 25-mile highway trip, we'll give a ¼
> mile acceleration; more simply a 100-mile trip with 1-mile acceleration. At
> any give time the motorcycle needs X power. A transmission is 5% less
> efficient than a non-transmission so over 100 miles it will take 100 miles *
> .05 = 5 units more power. The two motor system will take twice the power at
> acceleration 1 mile * 2 = 2 units more power. But if you are commuting in
> stop and go traffic then a 40-mile commute might have over a 1 of
> acceleration. So a transmission is 40 * .05 = 2 units and a two motor system
> is still 2 units. So if your steady speed is more 40 times longer than your
> acceleration then a two motor system is more efficient. But if your steady
> speed is less 40 times more than acceleration then a transmission is more
> efficient. A closer study is needed and results will vary based on
> rider/bike/weight/route/etc… but I think it will be clear that in short city
> travel a transmission is more efficient, but in longer highway travel a two
> motor system is more efficient. But since an electric motorcycle has a
> finite range and can't be filled up at the pump then it should be built to
> be the most efficient for the longest-range option. Hence once you get an
> electric bike going over 50 miles on a charge [i.e. lithium] and you have
> some plans to travel on the highway then a two motor system is the best
> choice. Further with a 100+ mile range, city travel never be a concern, even
> with the lower efficiency of the two motor system, but when a long trip on
> the highway is needed the two motor system will shine as it will give you
> more range than a transmission.
> >
> >
> > harry
> >
> > Albuquerque, NM
> > http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/1179
> > http://geocities.com/solarcookingman
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it
> now.
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ%20>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.8/1415 - Release
> Date: 5/5/2008 6:01 AM
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to