Does this mean there is no plan to improve jack support? I'm sure everyone who would like to run it with jack has a reason. For me it is because I have a firewire audio interface and lmms is the *only* app I would like to run that doesn't work with it. It would also be great to have it interface with other applications the way jack was intended. If this is the sentiment towards jack support then I'll just move on from lmms and stop holding out hope that it ever improves.
--Steve On Saturday 26 December 2009 02:44:58 pm Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Why? Our goal is to provide an all-in-one-solution which obsoletes things > like JACK. Native ALSA backend allows smaller latencies without xruns > (except if CPU is simply overloaded) so all I can suggest is to use LMMS > with ALSA and enjoy it :) We're using the JACK API the way it is > documented, so no idea what's wrong. > > Toby > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Lmms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users
