Assuming the release can be compiled on fedora, I can review and vote on it (as an IPMC member).
John On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 12:26 PM William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2016 02:53, "Thorsten Schöning" <tschoen...@am-soft.de> wrote: > > > > Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr, > > am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 23:54 schrieben Sie: > > > > > If not you, then ...? Are there other committers who are interesting > in taking > > > the release mantle, and really give yourself breathing room to just > improve > > > the code without all the rest of the details? > > > > Torsten Wiebesiek seemed interested to read the details about the > > release process, so we might wait the next days to see what he says. > > While we are waiting to find out who is interested in the heavy lifting of > creating a release candidate, who here is willing to review such candidates > and cast a +/-1 vote for release of the package? The review period should > rarely be shorter than 72 hours but I've seen 10 day review periods for > projects with especially small communities. > > As an aside the ASF only 'releases' the source code. Some projects create > convenience binaries but they are not the subject of the vote. Some > projects refuse to create binaries as a matter of policy (Subversion, for > example.) >
