Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr,
am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 18:26 schrieben Sie:

> While we are waiting to find out who is interested in the heavy
> lifting of creating a release candidate, who here is willing to
> review such candidates and cast a +/-1 vote for release of the
> package?

Which of the following links would be the ones the project members
need to care about in the release process? We wouldn't vote for the
incubator release, because we are the subjects to vote on, right?

But what about the release candidate, that's the one we need to review
within the project ourselfs and vote for that until we are satisfied?
Afterwards the release manager would end up doing what is mentioned
for the incubator release and people like John D. Ament would vote on
that, completely outside the project?

Or does the project never vote "internally" at all, but only deals
with -1 votes for the incubator release and needs to fix bugs and such
until all external voters are satisfied?

I'm not sure if there are two independent votes or such one and if the
project members itself are part of those.

http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practices-release-candidates

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Thorsten Schöning

-- 
Thorsten Schöning       E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme      http://www.AM-SoFT.de/

Telefon...........05151-  9468- 55
Fax...............05151-  9468- 88
Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow

Reply via email to