Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr, am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 18:26 schrieben Sie:
> While we are waiting to find out who is interested in the heavy > lifting of creating a release candidate, who here is willing to > review such candidates and cast a +/-1 vote for release of the > package? Which of the following links would be the ones the project members need to care about in the release process? We wouldn't vote for the incubator release, because we are the subjects to vote on, right? But what about the release candidate, that's the one we need to review within the project ourselfs and vote for that until we are satisfied? Afterwards the release manager would end up doing what is mentioned for the incubator release and people like John D. Ament would vote on that, completely outside the project? Or does the project never vote "internally" at all, but only deals with -1 votes for the incubator release and needs to fix bugs and such until all external voters are satisfied? I'm not sure if there are two independent votes or such one and if the project members itself are part of those. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practices-release-candidates Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow