On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:10:50PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote: > sci-fi film (no-one's mentioned 2001 yet, or the David Lynch version of > Dune- there was a good article about this in Sight and Sound last > month). There's a good reason for that, they are both complete shite. 2001 totally overhyped, Dune totally uncomprehensible. If I need to have read the book to understand the film, then there's no way it's "best film of all time" material. cheers Andrew
- Re: The best film of all time? Andrew Wilson
- Re: The best film of all time? Lucy McWilliam
- Re: The best film of all time? Greg McCarroll
- Re: The best film of all time? Chris Devers
- Re: The best film of all time? Jasper McCrea
- Re: The best film of all time? David H. Adler
- Re: The best film of all time? Paul Mison
- Re: The best film of all time? David H. Adler
- Re: The best film of all time? Mike Jarvis
- Re: The best film of all time? Jonathan Stowe
- Re: The best film of all time? Andrew Wilson
- Re: The best film of all time? Jonathan Stowe
- Re: The best film of all time? David Cantrell
- Re: The best film of all time? David Cantrell
- Re: The best film of all time? Damian Conway
- Re: The best film of all time? Jonathan Stowe
- Re: The best film of all time? David Cantrell
- Re: The best film of all time? David H. Adler
- Re: The best film of all time? Neil Ford
- Re: The best film of all time? Barbie [home]
- Re: The best film of all time? Barbie [home]