On 30 Oct 2002, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> [%
> FOR key IN hash.keys
> %]
> <tr>
> <td><em>[% key %]:</em></td>
> <td>[% hash.key %]</td>
> </tr>
> [%
> END
> %]
>
> You seem to be reinventing Mason, with a slightly different syntax
As a Mason user, I see a major difference here in that it is not clear
which of the [% %] blocks are designed to output and which are flow
control. Mason explicitly uses <% %> for outputting values and <%perl> or
a line starting with a % for procedural control. I think that this is
an important issue.
> (<perl> .. </perl>, instead of <% .. %>). And that's why I hate Mason
> now. There's no "mini-language" that I can teach a non-Perl-head to
Pick a subset of Perl and teach only that? Why do you have to translate
everything to uppercase in order to pick out a subset?
> help me with my pages. They must be exposed to ALL OF PERL for
> anything non-trivial. Ugh.
S.
--
Shevek
I am the Borg.
sub AUTOLOAD{my$i=$AUTOLOAD;my$x=shift;$i=~s/^.*://;print"$x\n";eval
qq{*$AUTOLOAD=sub{my\$x=shift;return unless \$x%$i;&{$x}(\$x);};};}
foreach my $i (3..65535) { &{'2'}($i); }
