On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Anselm Lingnau <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alex Clemente wrote: > > > NetworkManger is easy. > > NetworkManager : iproute2 = GNU Emacs : vi > Would you argue that there people who use Emacs to debug the result of using vi (or vice versa)? In that regard, NetworkManager : ifup/ifdown or NetworkManager : systemd-networkd would be better comparisons. Which brings us to the question, if (and at which level) we should ask candidates to know about nm and systemd-networkd, i.e. with their already mentioned increasing relevance on laptops and IaaS instances. 109.2 (basic network configuration) ( and 109.3 (basic network troubleshooting) each have a weight of 4. We currently list both ip and some net-tools (even in case we drop ifup/ifdown), although I wouldn't mind adding a hint that the focus is using iproute2. > Since we seem to be keeping vi: If we add NetworkManager to the exam, we > should also add GNU Emacs ;^) > Depending on the final decision on editors (which isn't made yet), adding awareness of Emacs and nano to 103.8 might make everyone equally unhappy :) Fabian
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
