On March 16, 2021 at 6:24:22 PM, Les Ginsberg wrote:
Les: Hi! > But one thing I find missing in your response is some info on what problem > YOU think needs to be addressed? I simply think that the specifications are not complete without guidance on how to use/assign the unused bits. I rather try to close that door before a potential problem may come up. In the extreme case anyone can make use of the bits, through the ISE or a different SDO -- ideally we will be paying attention, but may not. Sure, a registry doesn't stop implementations from squatting on codepoints either (even inside the IETF), but at least people have to want to bypass the allocation rules. My 1c. Alvaro. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
