On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Adrian Snyman said: > We are looking at implementing thin clients across our WAN. However, > my concern is that due to the limited amout of bandwidth we have, the > thin clients will be unusable. > > How much traffic can we expect on a 64k/bit line with 10 users on the > remote side ??
I see about 8k of NFS to maintain a quiescent cxn - i.e., no app running. Depending on the topology, it would seem to make more sense to implement the TS on the remote side, and use masq to pipe the data over the 64k line. This is assuming that there are enough clients on the remote side to warrant a srvr. If it's only one or two machines then it's a different matter I suppose. > Does xdmcp only send update traffic through ?? or is it a full screen > refresh ?? AFAIK, in general X does pretty well running over a remote cxn. ---------------------------------------------------------------- John Karns [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net
