Being uniformed on this thread I'll say "I don't know no MO". I have some knowledge of piracy, but only on the high seas. Is it so important (and it might be for the personal income of the individuals involved) that this list be dedicated to the finding of rights for publication. If that is the case is there a list with all the same people where publishing rights are less important than the music? I am not a scholar, nor do I pretend to be. I do read things, and make opinions for myself, but I gather that a scholar must have some qualification. I don't. I shall retire to my bed at this late hour with that knowledge (where I shall console myself by eating popcorn and reading a book, the latest being Evan Thomas' writings on John Paul Jones, a flawed but seldom examined Naval Officer who basically created the US Navy. But I might choose another book on musical history, or another on Celtic Warriors. I'll know which I read when I pick it up off my bedside table. But scholar I'm not, as one needs an official imprimature for that.
Best, Jon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Arthur Ness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lute Net" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 6:49 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: Leonardo Sciulzzo > > Besides, Ophee's edition has so many mistakes, I couldn't refer to it to > make my point about Beethoven influences. > MO deliberately inserts mistakes into his "editions", to track down > potential piracy. A scholarly type, isn't he? > RT > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > $0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer > 10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more. > Signup at www.doteasy.com > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > >
