On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 04:49:06 Dirk Geschke wrote: > > + ssh -X {container} > > And all these work even with unprivileged containers.
Thanks... that is pretty much the plan as per other message for LXC. (See other other reply too.. Thanks though.. I do this for a ton of other stuff, just not LXC right now. Most of these are headless servers running LAMP stuff for "dev/testing" and then pushed to servers. I am more interested in comments in re LXC v. VM setup... both are pretty "heavy" in terms of solutions for the single issue I have... Unfortunately I was pushed to this due to my vary persnickerty tastes in email clients. I like that KMail doesn't deal with HaTeMailL, and just barfs all over it! :) Plus the decades worth of mail spool, filters, and that KMail2 is just broken on imports, and a long list of stuff not really cogent for this list/discussion. I am thinking that LXC might actually have some advantages for the LONG TERM? myabe not... I am just more curious to hear others.. Obviously this list is probably leaning more to an LXC solution, but like I said both are really killing gnats with an F-4 phantom and napalm. :) ;) Any views, opinions, comments in re that LXC might be better, worse, even v. a VM??? Just curious, as I probably am going the LXC route, as it gives me another test use case. I found the LXC containers for LAMP dev/testing to be quite a hit with my group v. a VM setup for them. _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users