Re: Official RPM package and icon file [was Re: Feedback]

[Seak, Teng-Fong]

> >      Oh I see.  In this case, could you put i586 instead of i386 in the name,
> > please?
>
> Why should one put 'i586' into the name of a package that is supposed to
> work on the i386 architecture?

     Oh I see.  Actually, when I asked that an i586 optimized rpm package be made,
you answered that "These RPMS are build for Redhat 6.X on a i586
machine" (sic), so I thought you implied that it's already optimized for i586 and
that's why I thought it's better to call it so.