Scott Kostyshak wrote: > B) Branch 2.2.x from master and continue "unstable" development on > master. > > To me it does not feel right that the commits in-between 2.2.0rc1 and > 2.2.0 final would not *necessarily* be in master's commit history. I
I would prefer to see 2.2.0 final commit in master, reason being history searches via git log etc. Pavel
