Jesse,
I feel like I ran into that exact problem before a couple years ago when I
was using my '102 for packet radio. Something also about poor battery life
from the laptop while the TNC was plugged in as well? I didn't keep good
notes, and I was testing several TNCs (two KPC-3s, a KPC-2, and a MFJ-1274.

Thanks for documenting all the detailed measurements and sharing it with
the group!
-Alex

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 4:08 PM Jesse Bertier <berti...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Fellow M100 Enthusiasts:
>
> I kept at it, trying all the various suggestions from the group.  I
> finally solved the issue - the TNC had a loopback connection from DTR to
> DSR.   The problem disappeared entirely when I removed that loopback
> connection the TNC was doing.
>
> If interested, I posted the details here:
>
> https://n1ugk.com/2023/09/trs-80-model-100-with-the-kpc-3/
>
> With that mystery solved, I can now use the M100 for what I intended to
> use it for.
>
> On Sep 8, 2023, at 7:28 PM, Daryl Tester <
> dt-m...@handcraftedcomputers.com.au> wrote:
>
> On 9/9/23 00:10, Jesse Bertier wrote:
>
> I wanted to follow up with this issue - As it turns out, the TNC itself
> seems to be the culprit, at least with the M100.  Even small text strings
> get garbled, with software flow control enabled on both sides.  That TNC
> works fine with a PC, just not the M100.  Next time I have the scope out,
> I’ll take a look at the line and compare, and work back into the M100 as
> needed out of curiosity.
>
>
> Sounds suspiciously like clocking tolerances (of the serial line).  I
> thought
> it used to be 20% (from the "olden days") with 16x oversampling), but
> current
> Internet Wisdom (for what that's worth) says ~ 5%.  If you've got one
> device
> that's slightly fast, and the other slower, you''ll see this sort of
> behaviour.
>
> (I used to work on a serial port switch in the 80's.  That sod had
> something like
> a +0.5% tolerance, although its negative was relatively normal. The above
> fault
> was well known).
>
> Cheers,
>  --dt
>
>
>

-- 
Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental.
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.
The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them is left as an exercise for the reader.
The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the
second god coefficient.  (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral
polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) Thanks /usr/games/fortune

Reply via email to