Cara, my only comment is thank you for stating what I was trying to say, but 
apparently not very clearly.
So, you have a wonderful Holiday as well and no further from me on this topic.

On Dec 22, 2009, at 10:05 PM, Cara Quinn wrote:

>   Okay, guys, enough!
> 
>   Personally, as I read it, the original point was not necessarily to convert 
> anyone to Apple. It was to establish that access out-of-the-box is a very 
> desirable thing. 
> 
>   I support this view whole-heartedly as do most (if not all) of us here. 
> 
>   For some who may have funding from rehab organizations this level of access 
> may be taken for granted, but for those whom choose to pay for their own tech 
> solutions, the idea of universal access is definitely a welcome one. 
> 
>   As well, for those living completely independently of sighted assistance, 
> bolt-on solutions just don't cut it. -And, I'd posit, that this kind of 
> scenario is merely somewhat of a 'pseudo' sense of independence. If your 
> computer or phone crashes to the point that you need to rely on someone to 
> help you simply for the fact that they are sighted, then, in a sense, how 
> independent are you really?
> 
>   So, whether you love Microsoft, Apple, and any cell phone manufacturers, or 
> the screen access solutions they entail, I think we can all agree that more / 
> better / easier access is a terrific thing! Yes?…
> 
>   Thanks so much for such a great discussion, and I'd personally love to see 
> this continue on Chris's VO BS list if Chris and ya'll are up for it. :)
> 
>   To everyone, I wish you and yours a truly lovely holiday season!…
> 
> Smiles,
> 
> Cara :)
> ---
> View my Online Portfolio at:
> 
> http://www.onemodelplace.com/CaraQuinn
> 
> Follow me on Twitter!
> 
> https://twitter.com/ModelCara
> 
> On Dec 22, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Tyler Littlefield wrote:
> 
> defending? YOur flippent I'm better than you so go away attitude really 
> doesn't say much for your position.
> On Dec 22, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Scott Howell wrote:
> 
>> Well whatever, because now your message isn't making a lot of sense. At this 
>> rate your defending yourself way to hard, so lets just move along to a new 
>> topic. We all know VO is great or we wouldn't be using it. I don't care 
>> about JAWS WE, NDA, or whatever other flavor of WIndows screen reader you 
>> choose to talk about. It all boils down to what works and how you go about 
>> it is what matters and that was pretty much my point.
>> So, hey, go enjoy whatever machine/OS/screen reader. Have a great Holiday.
>> On Dec 22, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Tyler Littlefield wrote:
>> 
>>> Again, vo is great. Everyone is making reasons why it is good, which wasn't 
>>> the point in what I said. All I'm saying is the fact that the mac would 
>>> work from the store I bought it on doesn't mean much as I didn't even buy 
>>> it from a store. Yes, it is great. I love the built-in screen reader 
>>> support, but it seems we go over how amazing it is at least once or twice a 
>>> week when someone else is converted. I love it's stability and security 
>>> over windows. But the fact that I have to install a program really doesn't 
>>> irc me all to much. It is a bit hard, but with things like NVDA I can walk 
>>> up to a windows system and pop in a USB key and be read to roll. Sure it 
>>> doesn't support everything, but it supports quite a bit to make it worth 
>>> using. I do tech support and computer repair around the town I live in, and 
>>> I've used this solution coupled with narrator many times to get me up and 
>>> running on a system I'm fixing. Along with a set of programs I built for 
>>> troubleshooting and cleaning up viruses and such, NVDA is amazing. Sadly 
>>> though more and more people are buying macs, it's not a huge chunk of the 
>>> market to the point where I can just walk to any computer and more than 
>>> likely it'll be a mac. While there are macs out there, the whole "I can go 
>>> anywhere and use it," doesn't exactly work, because there really aren't to 
>>> many floating around. I believe that in order to be productive, we need to 
>>> be able to use *any* computer, whether it be windows or mac, and even a 
>>> linux system, though a portable linux reader doesn't currently exist to my 
>>> knowledge.
>>> 
>>> On Dec 22, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Chris Blouch wrote:
>>> 
>>>> One other nice thing with VO is it draws a box on the screen to show where 
>>>> focus is which helps a lot when collaborating with folks who can see the 
>>>> screen. Jaws doesn't do this so when working together it can be hard to 
>>>> tell where the Jaws user is on a page. No such problem with VO and you 
>>>> could even pull up the caption panel to make it even more clear what VO 
>>>> was just saying.
>>>> 
>>>> CB
>>>> 
>>>> Michael Huckabay wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes verry good points. You wouldn't have jaws on every computer. Say you 
>>>>> go to work and have to use a computer. Well with a PC and jaws you would 
>>>>> hav to get jaws and put it on that computer wich is changing a computer 
>>>>> that possibley you would mabey not be using all the time. With a mac all 
>>>>> you have to do is turn vo on and your set.  So if it was a differnt 
>>>>> computer well you would still be able to work with it.  One other thing 
>>>>> is if you had to help some one say a sighted friend fix there computer. 
>>>>> You would have to put some sort of speach software on it because you 
>>>>> could help them. With a mac you could sall the problem and then just turn 
>>>>> vo off.
>>>>> Just some of my thoughts on this.
>>>>> Mike.
>>>>> On 2009-12-22, at 4:42 PM, John André Netland wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Well, I think you forget one important point in this discussion; The Mac 
>>>>>> and the iPhone/iPod Touch not only speaks out of the box in the Apple 
>>>>>> Store, it also talks without any additional software on any Mac and any 
>>>>>> iPHone/iPod Touch your friends, your family, your internet cafés, your 
>>>>>> library, your school, your university, your work etc etc have at their 
>>>>>> location. So, you are not forced to use only your own special edited and 
>>>>>> pre-installed PC at home or at work, with only one authorization 
>>>>>> available. You are free to use any Mac/iPHone/iPod Touch on this planet. 
>>>>>> If your unit is stolen, lost, broken or simply not where you currently 
>>>>>> are, there are always another one available. No re-installing, 
>>>>>> re-authorization, help to perform installation etc etc. That is a 
>>>>>> consept I like, and would like to benefit from. In addition, my Mac and 
>>>>>> iPHone is currently what makes me productive and able to run my business 
>>>>>> with success. NOt that I could not do just that with a PC, but not wit
>>>>>> h that kind of freedom.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just my little point of view on this subject. Smiles.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Take care, and have a lovely Christmas everyone!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> John André
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 22. des. 2009, at 22.13, Tyler Littlefield wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>> I believe you should re-read my message. I said VO still needs help, 
>>>>>>> not "I still need help."
>>>>>>> While a computer that talks off-the-shelf is great, that's no reason to 
>>>>>>> tell someone they need to buy the mac. While I like the mac, the cost 
>>>>>>> really doesn't balance out having a computer that talks in the apple 
>>>>>>> store.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I still stand by what I've said since I received voiceover. There are 
>>>>>>> some things that VO does and doesn't do better than Jaws. I think we 
>>>>>>> should be looking at what the reader gives us when advertizing it 
>>>>>>> rather than saying "You can use this in the store." Because in reality 
>>>>>>> it doesn't really matter to our productivity if it works off the shelf. 
>>>>>>> While I think the IPhone is great, as I said, I will be buying 
>>>>>>> something that isn't an IPhone because of it's voice active issues. 
>>>>>>> Reading off a number while being with someone if you want to 
>>>>>>> three-way-call is quite annoying in its self, much less having to make 
>>>>>>> sure things are quiet.
>>>>>>> On Dec 22, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Scott Howell wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>> Tyler,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I do not understand your comment below.  What does it talking out of 
>>>>>>>> the box have to do with whether you need help.  I do not understand 
>>>>>>>> the connection.  Can you elaborate?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Dec 22, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Tyler Littlefield wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>> Sure, but just because it talks out of the box doesn't mean much. 
>>>>>>>>> Don't get me wrong, I love my VO, but there still are things that it 
>>>>>>>>> needs help with.
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 22, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Scott Howell wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>>> ALthough I agree there needs to be no mission in converting folks,, 
>>>>>>>>>> I do believe it makes sense to let any and all know.  Whether you 
>>>>>>>>>> like the iPhone or not is in my mind irrelevant.  What is relevant 
>>>>>>>>>> is the fact that finally now a blind or visually impaired person can 
>>>>>>>>>> now go into a store and purchase an accessible product, whether that 
>>>>>>>>>> be a computer, iPhone, or iPod, and not have to purchase additional 
>>>>>>>>>> and expensive software makes a tremendous difference.
>>>>>>>>>> I think there is more to be gained by proving the Mac or other 
>>>>>>>>>> offerings by Apple are viable solutions is what will sell the 
>>>>>>>>>> product to a blind or visually impaired user honestly.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 22, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Tyler Littlefield wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>>> The iphone seems nice enough, but lets not go on a converting 
>>>>>>>>>>> rampage. I'm personally getting something else, because I don't 
>>>>>>>>>>> like the iphone, even if we had service for it where I'm at.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 22, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Jess wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I'm getting the IPhone 3 GS today. But more than that, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> folks, we need to keep the trend of switching to the Mac and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> IPhone going. The more people we have switching, the more inclined 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apple will be to continue support and development for Voice OVer.
>>>>>>>>>>>> For the first time, I can walk into a store, pick up a phone, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> have it talk out of the box. I don't have to have this special 
>>>>>>>>>>>> software that makes my phone accessible, and explain to people, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> oh, this is special software that reads aloud what you see on the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> screen. When I mention to people that I am going to get the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> IPhone, I feel a great deal of satisfaction that people don't look 
>>>>>>>>>>>> at me and go, well Jess, youre blind, so how the hell will you be 
>>>>>>>>>>>> able to use it? It's awesome that I can be treated as an equal. We 
>>>>>>>>>>>> half! to keep this trend up! Otherwise, what we have waited for, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> hoped for, and longed for, access to something right out of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> box, will soon be gone forever! And by the way, every time I try 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to convince someone that accessibility is a right and we have the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> right to have 100 percent access to everything we buy, that 
>>>>>>>>>>>> argument that we are to small of a market is always what I get. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry, but Apple is proving that argument to be void, and I 
>>>>>>>>>>>> have never agreed with 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it and never will. Any thoughts on this post?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jes
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>>>   
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> 
> --
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> 
> --
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.


Reply via email to