On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Andrew Flegg <and...@bleb.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 13:58, Henrik Hedberg > <henrik.hedb...@innologies.fi> wrote: >>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:16, Andrew Flegg wrote: >> >>>> Agreed. -maemo0 to -maemo1 is supposed to be a Maemo-specific change >>>> or a packaging change (AIUI). Native packages (such as Hermes, >>>> Attitude etc.) don't have that suffix and use a traditional x.y.z >>>> numbering scheme. >> >> Not necessarily. There is no official version numbering sceme for >> native Maemo packages. For example, some packages are using date, like >> 20091019. > > True. > >> Packages are promoted with the web interface. Simple checkbox there >> is enough to implement this feature. > > Except how do you try to prevent abuse (whether intentional or > accidental)? At least with the version number you've got some safety > check (although it is in no way comprehensive). It also requires more > changes at more levels (I bet), so harder to implement.
I don't see the difference between the safety of version numbers or check boxes on the promotion page since I control both. Frank _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
