IMHO, and I’m not a lawyer like Anne, but I think in common language what she is trying to explain. Like in GDPR which makes it so you can decline cookie data, that link is just one cookie, and they give us the option to decline other cookies but necessary or leave the site all together. Is this the gist of the current legal framework in the US?
> On Feb 24, 2024, at 3:19 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop > <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > > > >> On Feb 24, 2024, at 12:41 PM, Andrew C Aitchison <and...@aitchison.me.uk> >> wrote: >> >> Do you read "visiting a single Internet Web page" >> as excluding interaction with that page ? >> >> If so, how do I provide my opt-out preferences by ... >> "visiting a single Internet Web page" ? > > A strict construction of that language would suggest to me that yes, that's > what it says - *however*, I also don't think that's what was intended, and it > is on these ambiguous (regardless of how slightly) turns of phrase that > entire cases are decided. > > If I were brought in on a case that turned on deciding what this language > meant, I could argue either side, and convincingly so, I believe. > > Anne > > --- > Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. > Email Law & Policy Attorney > CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy (ISIPP) > Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing > law) > Creator of the term 'deliverability' and founder of the deliverability > industry > Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook > Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange > Dean Emeritus, Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School > Prof. Emeritus, Lincoln Law School > Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop > Counsel Emeritus, eMail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
