I may be wrong, but Sharp doesn't really strike me as a half-arsed company with no money to spend on product development... My 702 was cheap, looks good and works very well. Sony stuff is nice, but they have some wobbly foibles too. PrinceGaz wrote C'mon guys-- Sony can throw many times the budget and staff at improving and checking their ATRAC algorithm than Sharp. ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- MD: Image is nothing. Sound is everything. Obe... Kade Hansson
- RE: MD: Image is nothing. Sound is everyth... Martin Schiff
- RE: MD: Image is nothing. Sound is everyth... Mark I. Ross
- RE: MD: Image is nothing. Sound is ev... Kade Hansson
- MD: CD-R conspiracy (Sony DVD player ... Jake Hamby
- Re: MD: Image is nothing. Sound is ev... Ralph Smeets
- RE: MD: Image is nothing. Sound i... Martin Schiff
- Re: MD: Image is nothing. Sound i... Ralph Smeets
- RE: MD: Image is nothing. Sound i... Tony Antoniou
- MD: Assumptions (OT) J. Coon
- Re: MD: Sharp 701/702s for 99 Pounds at RS Alan Dowds
- Re: MD: Sharp 701/702s for 99 Pounds at RS Richard Wright
- Re: MD: Sharp 701/702s for 99 Pounds at RS Dan Frakes
- Re: MD: Sharp 701/702s for 99 Pounds at RS Jerry Jelinek
- Re: MD: Sharp 701/702s for 99 Pounds at RS Ralph Smeets
