From: Stainless Steel Rat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: MD-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2000 6:08 PM Subject: Re: MD: quality of optical cables > Practicality: optical jacks are significantly smaller than the RCA jacks > digital coax uses, making it a preference for portable equipment. 2.5mm mono jacks are even smaller and could transfer TTL SPDIF without any problems at all..... Magic -- "Creativity is more a birthright than an acquisition, and the power of sound is wisdom and understanding applied to the power of vibration." Location : Portsmouth, England, UK Homepage : http://www.mattnet.freeserve.co.uk EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: MD: quality of optical cables Simon Gardner
- Re: MD: quality of optical cables jim
- RE: MD: quality of optical cables Richard Wright
- Re: MD: quality of optical cables Ralph Smeets
- RE: MD: quality of optical cables Martin Schiff
- Re: MD: quality of optical cables Ralph Smeets
- Re: MD: quality of optical cables Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: quality of optical cables (OF... Ralph Smeets
- Re: MD: quality of optical cable... Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: quality of optical cables Stainless Steel Rat
- MD: having optical connections in portables (... Magic
- MD: having optical connections in portabl... David W. Tamkin
- Re: MD: quality of optical cables Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: quality of optical cables Richard Wright
- Re: MD: quality of optical cables PrinceGaz
- Re: MD: quality of optical cables Guy Churchill
- RE: MD: quality of optical cables Simon Barnes
- RE: MD: quality of optical cables COneilliv
- RE: MD: quality of optical cables Martin Schiff
- RE: MD: quality of optical cables Richard Wright