Do you remember my (admittedly hideously subjective) comment about how Sharp
ATRAC sounds very different to Sony ATRAC? Well, I recently listened to a
whole bunch of other Sharp MD players (7xx, 8xx) and decided they sounded
very very similar to my 831. Then I took my 831 back to the store in
disgust and complained about some other petty problem so that they'd
exchange it in the store. I asked for a Sony MZR90, and the sound quality
is, guess what, SO MUCH BETTER. Same setup, same hifi stuff, same
headphones (same ears!).
And I would happily use Sony MD for film recording
dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: MD: MD for recording sound for film?
>
> Sounds like he's been spewed at by someone who has no idea what they're
> talking about.
>
> I'd come back with "Have you ever actually listened to MD?" and then
> place my headphones on his head.
>
> I suppose the bozo would rather use plain cassette...or the mic on his
> minicam.
>
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Liquid Review wrote:
>
> >
> > Evening, all.
> >
> > Look, just a quick question - I was at a meeting tonight, and a fellow
> > there wanted to make short films, and was looking for a portable sound
> > recording source. I offered to lend him my Sony MZ-R37, and he said that
> > "MD sounds like shit, it's no good for recording audio for film work"...
is
> > this the case?
> >
> > I use my portable unit for recording interviews, and then broadcast them
> > off of it to air on radio... and no one's ever said it sounded anything
but
> > crystal clear.
> >
> > I am confused - who can set me straight?
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
