===================================================
          = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
          =     be more selective when quoting text         =
          ===================================================

Here are some sites that have information on the LM1973 audio mixer
chip.

http://search.dogpile.com/texis/search?q=LM1973&geo=no&fs=web

Timothy Stockman wrote:
> 
> >|3.  Adjust levels *before* the A/D to prevent overload while maximizing dynamic
> >|   range.  Most modern MD recorders have fixed gain *berfore* the A/D; not a
> >|   good thing!
> 
> >Absolutely.  So you use the LM1973's you mentioned in a programmable gain
> >configuration, right?  Are these parts quiet enough to work with
> >microphone-level signals?
> 
> I was planning on using a topology that had the LM1973 in the *feedback* loop
> of the microphone preamp stage.  Therefore, it would get its drive from the output
> of the mic preamp, after 40 dB or so of gain and attenuate it back to microphone
> level before feeding it to the inverting input.  They spec these chips at over 100 dB
> S/N, and this configuration exploits the available S/N to the max, so my guess is
> that it would be quite acceptable. This topology is what I was refering to when I
> was talking about channel trim.
> 
> The LM1973  contains three pots; I'd use the first one for level trim as described\
> above, and the other two as conventional attenuators, one feeding the left
> channel and one feeding the right.  That would allow the controlling microprocessor
> to emulate channel gain and pan, all the while maintaing an optimum gain
> structure to maximize S/N while minimizing overload.
> 
> >you're well over
> >1/2 watt--roughly 20 hrs. with 3-4 AA cells-- is this what you have in mind
> >for a portable MD system?
> 
> That would be great...  I'd planned to use NiHM AA cells...
> 
> >Also, I would think that some MD titling interface built into the mixer
> >might be a nice feature that would distinguish your mixer from anything else
> >that's commercially available.
> 
> A great idea!  I'd probably use an 8051 derivative (we've had great success
> here at work with the Philips 87c552 in battery powered equiopment; it has
> some nifty power-save and sleep modes).  This CPU would probably have
> enough resources left over to run a titling program.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?

My first web page  

http://www.tir.com/~liteways
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to