there´s another solution, but i don't remember the name, redis could do the job (i think)
2012/10/16 Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Kiran Kumar <krn1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Memcache doesn't automatically comes with Replication facility (High > > Avialibility) , i recomend you to use Repcache Patch on top of your > existing > > mecached for obtaining Replication of data > > within your servers . > > > > The only issue i see is that Repcached only works / Successfully Worked > when > > there are only two servers two replicate . > > If you are going to be stuck with this restriction - and have to build > your own fail-over, is there any advantage to using memcache compared > to redis with its much larger feature set? > > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmikes...@gmail.comi > -- Roberto Spadim
