"Logic may be our only bridge...." - CB

Often I find that the person who presents the term 'logic' has a
specific method and/or dogma in mind. . . one that is assumed to be a
universal when, of course, it is not.

There are numerous types of 'logic' as a starting point here.

On Oct 27, 8:14 am, "C B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Logic is not limited in scope, only the "human" use of it is. Logic is not
> an isolated system because the brain is not structured that way. Crays or
> thier ilk could be the only true isolated-logic producers we have. Our fat
> little pinkish grey brain cells can make up some pretty interesting stuff
> like "faith" - you can get lost squirming in metaphysics, which, in my
> opinion, does not take an intuitive thinker, but one that is willing to be
> led from logic toward delusion.  Okay, stake me in the heart, for that one,
> but I can't go there and believe me I have tried numerous times.
>
> Would you agree that Humans only have one perspective for each brain that
> can only be glimpsed by another brain and much of what we think is a
> delusion to someone else (that is not to be construed as disparaging to
> anyone else)? Logic may be our only bridge....
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:23 AM, stem cell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >>>Rick S said, "My aim is not to disparage logic,
> > only to point out that it is limited in scope."
>
> > Can you provide an example of another type of verification system that
> > works better than logic?  Do you know of any system that is not
> > "limited" or at least not as "limited" and what is that system?
>
> > The only ones I can come up with are psychic abilities and
> > FAITH.  :-)  Not sure "FAITH" is a "system" but go with me here. :-)
>
> > >>>Taylor said, "Most people who go to great lengths to point out limits of
> > science
> > (real or imagined) are usually doing so in order to remove obstacles
> > to your believing in their brand of woo."
>
> > Dr. Wayne Dyer, perhaps?  Charles Gillihan?  Michael Behe?  Oooh
> > oooh!  Wait...Steven C. Myer of the Discovery Institute.
>
> > >>>Taylor said, " I see nothing on the site about who "Dr. Terry Halwes" is
> > or what his
> > credentials are.  That normally means a medical doctor or dentist, at
> > best, but more likely a Ph.D. in theology or some other pseudo
> > science.  In other words, not a scientist."
>
> > What about a phone psychic?  Wait...did I just say that or think it?
>
> > stemcell
>
> > On Oct 26, 11:53 pm, Rick S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >      In researching an idea for an essay I had about the limits of
> > > logic, I came across a very interesting essay by a scientist, to which
> > > I will provide a link.  By the way, I also picked up some very
> > > interesting quotes about logic.  My aim is not to disparage logic,
> > > only to point out that it is limited in scope.  First the quotes:
>
> > > "What is laid down, ordered, factual is never enough to embrace the
> > > whole truth: life always spills over the rim of every cup."
> > > - Boris Pasternak
>
> > > "Pure logic is the ruin of the spirit."
> > > - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
>
> > > "A mind all logic is like a knife all blade. It makes the hand bleed
> > > that uses it."
> > > - Rabindranath Tagore
>
> > > The wrong view of science betrays itself in the craving to be right;
> > > for it is not his possession of knowledge, of irrefutable truth, that
> > > makes the man of science, but his persistent and recklessly critical
> > > quest for truth.
> > > Sir Karl Popper
> > > The Logic of Scientific Discovery
>
> > > Here's the link:  http://dharma-haven.org/science/terrible-truth.htm.
>
> > > Rick S- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to