"Please replace the word "spiritual" with something  else. Geesus!  -
J."

Perhaps you would like everyone to share your view about the word
'spiritual'? The result would be a true type of unity...a spiritual
notion. "Geesus!" indeed! HaHa


On Nov 19, 3:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please replace the word "spiritual" with something  else.
> Geesus!
>
> J.
>
> I’ve  found that as I age, there are those who wish to ‘assist’ an old
> fart like  me. And, there are those who couldn’t care less. I’m not
> sure this has  changed nor is even different from when I was young.
>
> When it comes to a  couple’s relations, the 4 major areas must all be
> met for success. Any one  or more missing will more often than not
> result in the failure of the  couple.
>
> Physical.
> Emotional.
> Intellectual.
> Spiritual.
>
> On  Nov 19, 2:12 pm, "Liz Purkrabek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
>
>
>
> > I just thought about your response.  I'm not suggesting  that it's unfair
> and
> > mean that men aren't sexually attracted to older  women.  I'm just saying
> > that a woman should be recognized for  having value after she has lost
> > physical attractiveness.  
>
> > Intellectually, I think men realize that this should be  the case, but I
> have
> > seen firsthand how quick men are to dole out hugs  and affection to an
> > "attractive" woman and an older woman not even be  acknowledged.  The guy
> > doesn't have to fake attraction or French  kiss the old lady, but some token
> > of respect should be given to the  lady!  
>
> > And what about this opening doors for ladies  bit!?  I noticed that when I
> > was pregnant, men stopped opening  doors for me.  So, at the times when I
> > have or eventually will  need assistance (when I get old) the guys are
> > letting the door slam in  my face, I assume because there is no perceived
> > (consciously or  otherwise) potential nookie exchange.
>
> > Having had these  experiences (of visibility and invisibility), I can easily
> > imagine how  my world is going to change over time. I need to find a gimmick
> > for  when I get old, so I will still be a recognizable individual.  I  was
> > toting with the idea of being the town's crazy cat woman, but the  smell
> > would get on my nerves, so I'm thinking of only having a few  cats, letting
> > my hair grow out and being the crazy, mysterious witch  lady that lives on
> > the hill and is rumored to cavort with the  devil.
>
> > liz
>
> > -----Original  Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of  Jason
> > (Memphis)
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:54  PM
> > To: Memphis Freethought Alliance
> > Subject: Re: I like this  picture. I found it while looking for other
> > pictures
>
> >  Liz,
>
> > I agree.  Attractive women get way, way too much  attention.  How do me
> > make society give attractive women less  attention so ugly women get
> > more or as much attention especially from  men?
>
> > Jason
>
> > On Nov 19, 7:13 am, "Liz  Purkrabek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It's not the  same thing at all.  Being ignored because you belong to a
> big
> >  > family or disinterested parents is not the same issue as being  ignored
> > > incrementally  based on physical attractiveness or  perceived value to
> > > society as a whole.
>
> > >  liz
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of  Jason
> > > (Memphis)
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008  10:57 PM
> > > To: Memphis Freethought Alliance
> > > Subject:  Re: I like this picture. I found it while looking for other
> > >  pictures
>
> > > Aren't kids in the "invisibility syndrome"  category too?   I know
> > > quite a few kids that are essentially  ignored especially with big
> > > families.  It is starting to be  less of an issue because many couples
> > > (or singles) aren't having  as many children so their one or two
> > > children get lots and lots  of attention.
>
> > > On Nov 18, 9:09 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
> > > > I like old chicks.
>
> > > >  J.
>
> > > > “I  do agree with Liz about the  "invisibility syndrome". But, isn't it
> > > > cultural  to the  western world?” – CB
>
> > > > One can generalize about any  thought. I  find that age alone can
> > > > produce a type of  ‘invisibility’ for some people.  When I was a kid, I
> > > >  seldom knew how to relate to the old folks let alone  found them  easy
> > > > to get to know. Ignoring them was the easiest defense  mechanism. . .
> > > > as ignorant as avoidance can be in the  long  run.
>
> > > > On Nov 18, 7:17 am, CrossBow  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> One theory
> > > is that  women go  through menopause in order to dump the hormones
> > >  > > and switch the ability  to produce for focus on caretaking  of
> > > grandchildren.
> > > > > Sounds like  evolution wants us to be social servants and makes use of
> > >  us to
> > > > >  further survival that  way...
>
> > > > > I do agree with Liz about the  "invisibility syndrome".  But, isn't it
> > > > >  cultural to the western  world?
>
> > > > > I have  mixed feelings about losing what beauty I have  had.  
> Sometimes
> > > it is
> > > > > a relief not to  maintain it.  Nice to  be needed for something
> > >  approaching
> > > > > wisdom instead of my  bosom:)
>
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:41 PM,  ornamentalmind  
>
> > > >  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > > > >  > "Because of the loss of status I feel as I age..." -  Liz
>
> > > > >  > Thanks for the stream Liz! And,  this quote of yours is what I see
> >  as
> > > > > >  the 'crime' of our culture. Historically, age has represented
> >  wisdom,
> > > > > > the opposite of a loss of status.  And, as I see it, door  opening,
> > as
> > > > > >  much as I was programmed to do it and still do on  occasion, has  
> not
> > > > > > been continued as a 'social grace' in many  pockets of our culture
> > > and/
> > > > > > or  has become a curiosity due to the  notion of being politically
> >  > > > > correct.
>
> > > > > > On Nov  17, 1:28 pm, "Liz Purkrabek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
> wrote:
> > > > >  > > Although I agree that beauty can  be more than skin deep, I've
> > >  always
> > > > >  > thought
> > > > > > > men were likely to respond first  to positive visual stimulation.
> > >  If,
> > > >  > > after
> > > > > > >  the attention was  caught, then other factors like personality or
> > > > > >  > intelligence entered into the picture.  I've thought about  just
> > >  this
> > > > > > subject
> > >  > > > > more and more as I get older and  realize that with  every year
> > that
> > > > > > passes,
> > > >  > > > fewer  and fewer men stop to open doors for me.  Where once even
> > the
> > > > >  > >  teenagers did so, now just the men about my age and older do.  I
> >  > > imagine
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >  > some point that the few men  who respond to me in such a  fashion
> > > will be
> > > > > > > doing so out of  pity when I am old and unable to open the door
> > >  myself.
>
> > > > > >  >   Because of the  loss of status I feel as I age (and also for
> > >  other
> >  > > > > > reasons), I am educating myself and developing myself  in ways
> > that
> > > have
> > > > > > >  little to nothing to do with the way I  look.  I don't want to  
> be
> > > caught
> > > > > > > unprepared when at  last the body completely gives and the face
> > >  sags.
>
> > > > > > > I  am already starting to  see wrinkles that don't go away when I
> > > stop
> > > >  >  > > smiling, and I never feared wrinkles until I started  seeing
> them.
> > >  I
> > > > > > think
> >  > > > > > that to become unattractive is  much more  problematic or even
> > > > devastating
> > > > > >  > because it seems  as though women  become invisible as they  lose
> > > their
> > > > > > >  beauty.
>
> > > > > > > This was sort of a  rambling email.  Sort of stream of
> > >  consciousness...
>
> > > > > > >  liz
>
> > > > > > > -----Original  Message-----
> > > > > > >  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > >  > >  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf  
> Of
> > > > > >  > ornamentalmind
> > > >  > > > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 12:29  PM
> > >  > > > > To: Memphis Freethought Alliance
> > > > >  > >  Subject: Re: I like this picture. I found it while looking  for
> > > other
> > > > >  > >  pictures
>
> > > > > > > What is obvious to me,  perhaps  because of my gender, is that in
> > the
> > > >  > > > current US culture, the  omnipresence of beauty  industry
> > advertising
> > > > > > > along with  programs on corporate tv and radio have been fairly
> > > >  > > >  successful in producing a trance like state within too  many
> >  women.
>
> > > > > > > The  'avarousness' found at the heart of  consumerism has been
> >  quite
> > > > > > > successful in supplanting a clear  view of reality within the
> > female
> > > > > >  > brain with one of being  born in the 'original sin' of having  a
> > > > > > > lack...lack of  beauty, lack of the  right shape, color, height,
> > > length
> > > > > >  >  nails, texture of skin etc.
>
> > > > > >  > My entire life, while I  do know how my eye appreciates  specific
> > > shapes
> > > > > > > and colors, I  find those with inner beauty to be in fact
> > beautiful
> >  > > > > > when it  comes to human beings. Anyone who has  this pure
> radiance
> > is
> > > > > > >  immediately apprehended as being beautiful.
>
> > > >  > > > Those  who do not know this innate and true beauty appear  to be
> > sad
> > > and
> > > > > >  > have  a sad life.
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 17, 8:39 am,  CrossBow  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >  > > > Google and image  Tiziano Vicellio
>
> > >  > > > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:49  PM, Liz  Purkrabek
> > > > > > >  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > > > > >  > > > I'm  not familiar with his works, but I will definitely do  a
> > > Google
> > > > > >  > search
> >  > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >  > see  what else he has to offer.
>
> > > > > >  > > >  liz
>
> > > > > > > > >  -----Original Message-----
> > > > >  > > > >  From: [email protected]
> > > > >  > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On
> >  Behalf
> > > Of
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to