All well and good for the environment where there is no competition,  
but we have outgrown that stage.   We are now in a place where we all  
are wanting the same resources and those are becoming far more  
scarce.  What happens when you exceed your bid?  This came to me  
while I was at the auction watching folks bidding up stuff to over  
retail prices.  B-i-L wants a plasma cutter.  Nice new hypertherm 350  
he decided I should bid to $400.  A woman took it all the way to $700 
+ after four of us bowed out at $450.

Water, fuel and food will be handled in a less civilized manner in a  
few years when we all want it.

clay

On Aug 21, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Tyler Backman wrote:

> Now we have gotten past the semantics, to the real philosophical
> disagreement :)
>
>> ... living on whatever food you can find, or eeking out a living
>> raising crops on a small plot of land, hoping there's not a drought
>> this year, living long enough to hopefully reproduce at least a few
>> offspring since infant mortality is in the ballpark of 50%, reaching
>> age 45 or so if you're lucky...  Sustainable in the sense that your
>> species continues to exist, i guess....  pretty much a "wild animal"
>> existence...
>
> You are illustrating a fundamental philosophical difference between
> our culture and that of cultures that live sustainably. Our society
> believes that we somehow are able to exist as an isolated entity
> without dependence on the natural environment for survival. We have an
> illusion that it's our own sheer will and ability to control and
> manipulate nature that keeps us alive, as opposed to seeing ourselves
> as a member of an ecological community for whom we depend on. This
> different world-view results in two totally different systems of
> environmental ethics, and two different ways of interacting with the
> natural environment. We either abuse and exploit it, or "protect" it
> such that we can't use it's resources at all, while they use the
> resources responsibly. I believe that this difference in world-view is
> what makes a sustainable society different from ours, and needs to
> change if we are going to avoid wiping ourselves out.
>
> You also mentioned that our society is "thriving and continually
> improving [its] standard of living." This is something that is
> impossible to prove unless you experience it firsthand, but the
> overall happiness and quality of life is often higher for most
> indigenous people that that of people in industrialized society,
> despite higher mortality disease and short life-spans. What use is a
> big expensive house, and excellent medical care when we have high
> depression rates and the people in our culture are just generally
> unhappy? We constantly strive for more technology, money, and material
> possessions in hope that it will give us a level of contentment with
> our lives that they already have without such things. Perhaps that's
> why they never felt the need to develop them? I don't think this is
> because indigenous people are "noble savages" but because there is
> something fundamentally wrong with our culture that conflicts with the
> way our minds work, and the way we evolved to live. What you call a
> "wild animal existence" isn't as horrible as most people from our
> "civilized" society imagine. It's very different (and not without
> serious disadvantages and shortcomings), but not inherently inferior.
> I know a few people from "civilized" society whom have gone to live
> with indigenous peoples to do humanitarian or environmental work, and
> decided they preferred living that way and didn't want to come back to
> "civilized" society.
>
> Also, most indigenous cultures are not without agriculture,
> technology, or medicine. Depending on where and how they live, many
> indigenous people are able to obtain everything they need for survival
> in a much smaller portion of their time than it takes most people in
> industrialized society to make a living, leaving a lot of time for
> developing art, technology, medicine, and just enjoying life and
> spending time with your family/community. They're not making
> computers, but I think you'll find that many indigenous people have
> found ingenious ways to get food that take up very little of their
> time, and have discovered a wide variety of medicines (many modern
> pharmaceuticals were discovered based on herbal remedies used by
> indigenous people). Many also have developed ways to store water and
> preserve food to mitigate the effects of environmental fluctuations
> such as drought.
>
>> deliver clean water and
>> fresh food in abundance, defend themselves against enemies
>
>
> Often, the need for us to address these issues is a result of problems
> that could have been prevented. If you have low populations and don't
> pollute your water, don't wipe out natural animal and plant
> populations, and don't try to pick fights with your neighbors these
> are non-issues.
>
> The point I am trying to make isn't that we should give up our modern
> society and live as indigenous people, but that we should have more
> respect for them, and realize that there is a lot we could learn from
> them about how to improve our quality of life and to live sustainably.
> In return, they could also benefit from our medicine, and technology
> without abandoning their culture. We are essentially at war with our
> natural environment, and on a path to quickly wipe ourselves out
> unless we learn from our mistakes and make some major changes to how
> we live.
>
>

_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to