by all means! he has to prove his claim. And we all know that a 30 year old 240D is not able to go that fast without the driver intending to push the car to its limits. Gump was able to chug along at 65 with minimal strain. Get it over 70 and you knew it was getting to the red zone. Sustained speed over 80 and you stop that really fast. By that time you have strained your foot to the floor.
clay 1974 450sl - Frosch - Two tone green 1972 220D - Gump - She is green, simple and ran 1995 E300D - Cleo - Used by the Queen of Denial POS 1987 SDL - Beware Nigerian Scammers On Feb 14, 2013, at 4:54 PM, dsereta...@yahoo.com wrote: > I got pulled over this afternoon on the Maine Turnpike. Trooper claimed that > I was doing 78mph. I don't agree but my speedo doesn't work. When I'm doing > 78 mph, I: > 1) realize that I'm speeding. > 2) am intentionally trying to push my car to its limit. > > Neither condition was met. I told the trooper that 78 was pushing the top > speed limit of my car and that I didn't believe that was the case. I asked > him to show me the radar reading but he rudely insisted that the machine > could not lock in the speed. Don't they have to be able to produce evidence > such as a radar reading? Is this worth appealing? > > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
