Ok, so progress is good.  Keep pressing!
-- 
Max Dillon
Charleston SC
'87 300TD
'95 E300

On October 19, 2017 5:59:48 PM EDT, clay monroe via Mercedes 
<mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>Well, I am sort of back in the saddle.
>
>I picked up Allen this morning.  The shop finished it last night.  She
>drives as well as I remember.
>
>NOW, to get the SOB insurance people to do their job.
>
>I paid to ransom my car before the adjuster could get his tow truck
>over and steal the car from the shop to send to the CoParts yard. 
>Insco was supposed to pay the storage fees, but never did.  When asked
>this week, they claimed they had, twice.   When I asked the body shop
>last week and this, as well as when I paid to pick up the car, turns
>out it never had been paid.
>
>I was supposed to sign a settlement at lunch, but there were just too
>many balls dropped.  I am holding out for them to get the proper
>payments made, and have proof that the title has been cleared, that it
>never shows as salvage.  When the stars align, then I can sign.
>
>
>
>clay 
>
>1974 450sl -  Frosch - Two tone green
>1986 SDL - Polei
>1982 300 SD - Allen
>
>retired models-
>2002 s430 - Victor, a Stately & well tailored crap
>1976 300D - Blei Vanst - it looks silvery
>1972 220D - Gump - She was green, simple and ran
>1995 E300D - Gave her life to save me against a Dame in a SUV
>POS 1987 SDL - Beware Nigerian Scammers
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 30, 2017, at 11:08 PM, G Mann via Mercedes
><mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Jails are full of people who made "bad choices"..... My take on his
>actions
>> is, regardless of how it is phrased, his action constitutes "Mens
>Rae"
>> which is a legal term for "Thought followed by Act" and is the
>qualifier
>> for having done a criminal act.
>> 
>> With all respect and regard for SHMBO wearing the legal hat... I
>suggest
>> you would be best served to engage local counsel and push legal
>resolution.
>> 
>> To my knowledge, there is no specific requirement to settle vehicle
>damage
>> quickly. So I brush off that his "desire to settle quickly" was a
>factor.
>> 
>> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:56 PM, clay monroe via Mercedes <
>> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> SWMBA is sort of looped in.  Overly busy with all the oil and gas
>work,
>>> now that Turnip has let loose the hounds of bidness, and smote the
>>> enviro-wienies.
>>> 
>>> I did make mention regarding the question if Amica trained him to be
>a
>>> putz, or is he just a congenital neo-max zoom-dweebie.
>>> 
>>> On more contemplation, I suspect he made a conscious choice to speed
>along
>>> a resolution because it took so long for me to locate a shop willing
>to
>>> even look at the car.  Most of the shops I took it to, just stared
>at it
>>> and passed.  No desire to work with single stage, no ability to
>match the
>>> paint with the stuff they spray, not enough payout based on the
>estimators
>>> initial review.
>>> 
>>> clay
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 30, 2017, at 4:48 PM, G Mann via Mercedes
><mercedes@okiebenz.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Ahhhh... Contraire` mon ami
>>>> 
>>>> To work at the insurance company, which has to possess a license
>from the
>>>> State, the individual working for that company has to also either
>be
>>>> licensed, or meet some state requirements to work the business....
>In
>>> every
>>>> state I have experience in dealing with..
>>>> 
>>>> Thus... the Company is legally culpable for the actions of it's
>employees
>>>> to follow the law.... failure to do so.. either by deliberate
>intent, or
>>> by
>>>> negligence... qualifies as having done harm to our esteemed fellow
>>>> member... ie "individually harmed".
>>>> 
>>>> If it is found in the discovery phase of trial preparation, such
>actions
>>>> are "regular and common" and the Company not only allows it, but
>>> practices
>>>> such in due course, even more powerful... for the plaintiff...
>>>> 
>>>> I have contact with an attorney here who, for the past 40 years has
>only
>>>> taken insurance malpractice cases... He has not lost a case in 38
>>> years....
>>>> I'm sure there is another like him in the subject state....
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes <
>>>> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On September 30, 2017 at 3:06 PM G Mann via Mercedes <
>>>>> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> About now.. I would be dialing a lawyer... were it me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> She's in Alaska, but I'm pretty sure Clay has been telling her all
>about
>>>>> it.
>>>>> Agree with you that messing with titled property that belongs to
>neither
>>>>> him nor his employer is clearly illegal, I just no longer think it
>done
>>> was
>>>>> with malicious intent. Never be too hasty to ascribe malicious
>intent
>>> when
>>>>> sheer stupidity is a plausible explanation.
>>>>> Mitch.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________
>>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>>> 
>>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>>> 
>>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>>> 
>>> 
>> _______________________________________
>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>> 
>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>> 
>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>> 
>
>
>_______________________________________
>http://www.okiebenz.com
>
>To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
>To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to