On Tue, 23 May 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:

> Your sub &x is a closure.  That's why it returns the previous value of
> $x.  When it gets re-defined, it should start looking at the value of the
> new $x.

nevermind what i said in the other reply about not being a closure.
you're right, it is by definition, i just assumed you were refering to the
Apache::Registry trap.

Reply via email to