Ken Williams wrote: > > I suggest having not just a simple checkmark, but a 3-way check. A > system either supports a feature, or it doesn't, or it *optionally* > supports it (can be switched on and off). This is often very helpful to > know, and might let one get a good sense of the differences between > various systems at a glance. Another great idea! Should we go one farther and have a checkbox for "coming in next version", or is that going to far? I'm thinking it is too easy to get wrapped up in "forward looking statements" by having "coming soon". -- Drew Taylor Vialogix Communications, Inc. 501 N. College Street Charlotte, NC 28202 704 370 0550 http://www.vialogix.com/
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating S... Erich L. Markert
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templat... Drew Taylor
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating S... Matt Sergeant
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templat... Gerald Richter
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templat... Drew Taylor
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templat... Greg Cope
- RE: Feature sets [was Re: Templating Syste... Perrin Harkins
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating S... Gerald Richter
- RE: Feature sets [was Re: Templating Syste... Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating S... Perrin Harkins
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Drew Taylor
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Matt Sergeant
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Drew Taylor
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Frank D. Cringle
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Ken Williams
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Frank D. Cringle
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Jonathan Swartz
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Ken Williams
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Drew Taylor
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Erich L. Markert