Ken Williams wrote:
> 
> I suggest having not just a simple checkmark, but a 3-way check.  A
> system either supports a feature, or it doesn't, or it *optionally*
> supports it (can be switched on and off).  This is often very helpful to
> know, and might let one get a good sense of the differences between
> various systems at a glance.
Another great idea! Should we go one farther and have a checkbox for
"coming in next version", or is that going to far? I'm thinking it is
too easy to get wrapped up in "forward looking statements" by having
"coming soon".

-- 
Drew Taylor
Vialogix Communications, Inc.
501 N. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
704 370 0550
http://www.vialogix.com/

Reply via email to