On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Ajit Deshpande wrote: > Well, the above question pre-supposes that Java is > inherently *better* than mod_perl for some definition of > "better". it's true. i stayed away from defining better in that msg, but explored in a separate one in this thread. suffice to say, the wealth of existing standards-based components, the focus on creating a platform for enterprise applications, and the competitive vendor landscape for development tools and infrastructure components, all of help define "better" imo. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection Drew Taylor
- Perl vs Java (XML Modules) Matt Sergeant
- Re: Perl vs Java (XML Modules) Drew Taylor
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection barries
- [OT] mod_perl longevity [Was: mod_perl advocacy project ... Ajit Deshpande
- Re: [OT] mod_perl longevity [Was: mod_perl advocacy... brian moseley
- Re: [OT] mod_perl longevity [Was: mod_perl advo... Ajit Deshpande
- [OT] Starting a Company on OS [Was: mod_perl longev... Gunther Birznieks
- RE: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection Dave Rolsky
- RE: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection brian moseley
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection Ben Cottrell
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection Chris Winters
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection Jim Woodgate
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection Dave Rolsky
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection Gunther Birznieks
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection Jim Woodgate