Re: [OT] Inspired by closing comments from the UBB thread.

[Jay Jacobs]

I wasn't clear enough... My point was more "six one way, half dozen the
other".  For a public package, keeping dependancies down to a minimum is a
bonus, as well as keeping performance up by not having to pre-process html
looking for perl code.  It can come down to a choice between
maintainability and better performance (to whatever degree).  I don't see
any glue-sniffing symptoms from choosing embedded html in perl over
embedded perl in html.

Jay

On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote:

> > "not to mention the HTML embedded all throughout the perl (are they on
> > glue?)"
> >
> > What's the alternative there?  Embed perl in the HTML?
>
> You could do that (Text::Template), or you could use a tool like Template
> Toolkit or HTML::Template.  See
> http://perl.apache.org/features/tmpl-cmp.html for a description of the
> available options.
> - Perrin
>
>