gzip problem in IE6
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q312496 is over
since

1. M$ provides a free patch;
2. those lazy users (who usually don't care to apply patches) are not able
to report problems anymore.

Personally, I would recommend not to deal with deflate when possible.

Thanks,
Slava

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Dick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Slava Bizyayev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: How practical is that Practical mod_perl?


> ok, i thought you might have been referred to problems that early
> versions of IE6 seemed to have with gzip, or with deflate problems in
> mozilla/n6.
>
> Slava Bizyayev wrote:
>
> >NN-4.X sends HTTP header
> >
> >Accept-Encoding: gzip
> >
> >requesting any web content. Unfortunately NN-4.X fails to ungzip css
files
> >and JavaScript libraries. It is pretty old and well-known bug in NN-4.X.
To
> >work around this bug mod_gzip uses internal procedures for recognition of
> >NN-4.X.  The similar approach is used in mod_deflate. Apache::GzipChain
does
> >not have internal resources to work around this bug.
> >
> >You can find on CPAN
> >http://search.cpan.org/author/SLAVA/Apache-CompressClientFixup-0.06/
which
> >is supposed to serve any mod_perl compressor including Apache::GzipChain,
> >but this handler is missed in example on p.402.
> >
> ># From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ># To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ># Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:05:06 +0200
> >#
> ># ... Our customers still include 17% Netscape 4 users, sigh ...
> >#
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Slava
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "David Dick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Slava Bizyayev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:41 PM
> >Subject: Re: How practical is that Practical mod_perl?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>The direct implementation of the example
> >>>configuration p.402 is supposed to lead you to about 15% of unsatisfied
> >>>clients recently.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Can we have some more information about what in the implementation leads
> >>to the unsatisfied clients?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to