On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Patrick Galbraith wrote:

> TT was ok, but it did use a bunch of ram ;)

So does Mason.  HTML::Template is no doubt much leaner, but it's also lean
on features.  Nothing wrong with that if it suits your needs, though.

Most Perl templating systems are probably slower and/or bulkier than PHP.

The best counter for PHP folks is one word, "CPAN" ;)

Also, Mason at least provides lots of features beyond templating, and is
as much of an app framework as anything.  This may be true of TT and the
others, I'm not really sure.


-dave

/*=======================
House Absolute Consulting
www.houseabsolute.com
=======================*/

Reply via email to