On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Jamie Lawrence wrote: > Mason isn't fast. It is, however, fast enough for high volume sites - > that I will assert.
Sure, amazon.com among them. > From my view, the utility of autohandlers and dhandlers, in terms of > code written vs. cost and time, is an enormous win. Add to that the > flexibility between library developmers and HTML coders, in that there's > a constant feedback loop that enforces reasonable development and > interaction to ensure that all roles are working for the same goal. I'm not gonna disagree with you. I consider Mason's features well worth the speed/memory costs. That's why I use it and develop it ;) -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
