Sorry about the empty message. What about Getopt::Easy or Getopt::Simple?
-J -- On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Martyn J. Pearce wrote: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 04:22:11PM +1100, Ken Williams wrote: > > I suggest something like GetOpt::Unified or GetOpt::Common or > > something. But don't take a really good namespace unless you > > plan on maintaining it. ;-) > > Fair point :-) > > I warm to Getopt::StdResource, and Getopt::Plus. Any votes out there? > > Mx. >
