On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:43:21PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > Sorry about the empty message.
Apology accepted ;-) > What about Getopt::Easy or Getopt::Simple? Nice try --- but I'm not sure it's any simpler, at least in Getopt terms. It's easier to add extra bits on top. I' ve actually submitted under the name 'Getopt::Plus' now. Thanks for the ideas! Mx.
