On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:04 AM, <ian.doche...@nomura.com> wrote: > So you are implying that > > FSA::Role::Moose > > Would be acceptable to you too?
Yes, if there were some existing non-Moose FSA::Role that you needed to distinguish your version from. Otherwise it's pointless. Imagine if everyone jumped immediately to being as specific as possible with their names; we'd have Net::SMTP::Object and Class::URI and Hash::Config and lots of similar garbage. Only be as verbose as you need to be. Let the next author worry about how to differentiate his or her module from yours. hdp.
