Am 21.09.2011 um 13:18 schrieb Hans Dieter Pearcey: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:28 AM, <ian.doche...@nomura.com> wrote: >> Does FSA::MooseRole satisfy everyone (or no-one)? > > I hate it. It seems like unnecessary noise. > > If the distinguishing feature of this code is that it is a role, then > name it FSA::Role or FSA::Rules::Role or something. In that case, I > don't think the fact that there are non-Moose roles matters very much; > you're encoding information about the API ("this package needs a class > to consume it"). > > hdp.
The question is, how would someone name his dist who wants to release a version of FSA::Role, which uses Role::Basic as Role framework? I think we need something like Any::Role :-) Cheers, mo