Re: MooseX::FSA::Simple

[Hans Dieter Pearcey]

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:28 AM,  <ian.doche...@nomura.com> wrote:
> Does FSA::MooseRole satisfy everyone (or no-one)?

I hate it.  It seems like unnecessary noise.

If the distinguishing feature of this code is that it is a role, then
name it FSA::Role or FSA::Rules::Role or something.  In that case, I
don't think the fact that there are non-Moose roles matters very much;
you're encoding information about the API ("this package needs a class
to consume it").

hdp.