On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:28 AM, <ian.doche...@nomura.com> wrote: > Does FSA::MooseRole satisfy everyone (or no-one)?
I hate it. It seems like unnecessary noise.
If the distinguishing feature of this code is that it is a role, then
name it FSA::Role or FSA::Rules::Role or something. In that case, I
don't think the fact that there are non-Moose roles matters very much;
you're encoding information about the API ("this package needs a class
to consume it").
hdp.
