+1 On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:19:37 -0700 Karen Etheridge <p...@froods.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:13:06PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > I'd really prefer that MooseX _only_ be used for extensions to > > Moose (at the meta level). > > Strongly agree. Although this depends on the cooperation of the > individual authors, I'd like to try approaching the owners of the > existing modules in this namespace and encouraging them to rename. > > > That said, another namespace for modules designed to work with > > other Moose _using_ modules might be useful. No good names come to > > mind right now, though. > > IMHO the name should primarily represent what it *does*, not what it > *uses*, so for example a role that is meant to be used in Catalyst > should start with Catalyst::Role::, not Role::Catalyst::. > > So for the original subject of this thread, I'd suggest > FSA::Role::Rules or FSA::Role::Rules::Simple. > >
