I don't recall how I found out that Heritage is a financial backer of Gavelsnipe (which is probably more appropriate than calling them a corporate ownership), but I've known, it's been talked about on Comic Book forums and the like.. But I have never been worried one bit about leaving my bids on gavelsnipe and it's easy for me to see how much money I have saved on both ebay and Heritage auctions by looking at my snipes and how mostly, they've never gotten close to my winning bids

then again, I'm not a conspiracist.
I know the only way for two people to keep a secret is if one of them is dead




At 01:50 PM 4/18/2012, David Kusumoto wrote:
Rich

How did you know? Through the site itself (which is key) - or through pals or by just "being in the know?" If a consumer signs up with GavelSnipe for the first time today, is there a PROACTIVE disclosure in GavelSnipe's terms and conditions about its relationship with Heritage? If so, it undercuts everything I've written and I owe everyone a big apology. -d.


----------
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:41:37 -0700
To: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com; MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
From: sa...@comic-art.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Potential Conflict of Interest? Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?

David

the ownership of Gavelsnipe by Heritage corporate was never hidden.. I knew about it the day I set up my own account


----------
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:24:52 -0700
From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest? Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I agree with Kirby too, particularly with his comment: "Any proxy bid system could be undermined with enough 'nefariousness' at work."

Hence while I wrote my "essay" with a level of air-tightness - I was trying to convey less personal suspicion about any "nefariousness" at work by Heritage - (and it's only because I know and trust Grey) - but with more concern about the link between GavelSnipe and Heritage - and how in my view, it has a level of newsworthiness with the media that Heritage doesn't need. Don't think so? Just REPLACE Heritage's name in my "essay" below - with Sotheby's or Christie's or Profiles in History. You see, your emotional reaction is based on the type of relationship and comfort level you may or may not already have with any auction house on earth. This is really a personal preference thing with people, e.g., they either trust the "leash" between the two entities - or they don't. I just put it out there because I know most people will read it - and most as a result will mull it over as another quirky element that riddles all hobbies, not just ours. -d.


----------
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:20:39 +0200
From: i...@motionpictureart.com
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest? Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I agree with Kirby. We've been using Gavelsnipe for eBay for quite some time, we don't buy from Heritage, and never had any problems.
Ron


----------
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:05:48 -0500
From: ki...@movieart.net
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest? Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I have used Gavelsnipe many times for Heritage and Ebay auctions and I have never had even one whiff of a feeling that I was being run up. I'm glad that this service exists because I like the snipe process. I
can set it and forget it.

Doesn't mean it couldn't happen if some nefarious persons wanted to pollute the process.

Any proxy bid system could be undermined with enough "nefariousness" at work.

Kirby


----------
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 02:13:00 -0700
From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
Subject: Potential Conflict of Interest? Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

* With the impending launch of Peter Contarino's, Sean Linkenback's and Ken Schacter's auctions (vs. fixed price sales which are there now), I've been visiting their MoviePosterExchange.com site. It's easy to navigate and very user-friendly. (BTW, where in the heck did the highly-touted $850,000 "Metropolis" 3-sheet go? I can't find it! Did it sell?) At any rate, while visiting the site's FAQs, I read that it has partnered with GavelSnipe, the sniping program service, which will be available to bidders for timed auctions. That's good news.

* But what's interesting - and this has nothing to do with MoviePosterExchange.com - is GavelSnipe "appears" to be owned by Heritage. If I'm wrong, please correct me - and a thousand apologies if I am. I'm less concerned about potential abuses like shilling and what not with Heritage's auctions - than I am about transparency. GavelSnipe's murky origins are troubling. I couldn't find much info about who owns or runs it. This is NOT a criticism of Grey - who I consider a pal. The issue of GavelSnipe's ownership - if indeed Heritage is its "owner" - is out of his hands. It's bigger than him because it's available to bidders in Heritage's other departments.

* If true, this is NOT like PayPal being owned by eBay. It's more like GavelSnipe being owned by Sotheby's or Christie's, e.g., a conflict of interest where potential abuses "could" occur - despite assurances that a "sniping subsidiary" of Sotheby's or Christie's - can operate independently - with an iron-clad ability to preserve the confidentiality of all scheduled "snipe" bids submitted online. Do you trust this, given what you've read in the news about Sotheby's, Christie's, price fixing, Wall Street buddies in bed with politicians trading stocks with confidential info, etc.?

* By using ANY sniping program, you are imparting the same trust you already give to auction sites when submitting "absentee bids" for "live" showroom sales. The difference is you can't be "run-up" while using a sniping program, or so you think, because your bids are placed in the last few seconds of a timed sale. But what if the wall protecting "sniped bids" is breached by another department in the SAME building? Here's what I know: GavelSnipe is based in Dallas and "uses SSL encryption (so that) your passwords are secured and not VIEWABLE by GavelSnipe personnel." I have no reason to distrust this. But what about actual snipe bid amounts before a sale closes? In the effort to make "sniping" available for clients like myself who've clamored for it - I hope Heritage hasn't errantly opened a can of worms by OWNING GavelSnipe - instead of PARTNERING with an independently-run third party company - such as JustSnipe or others like it.

* Before most of you scoff and dismiss what I'm saying as "manufactured paranoia" or "no big deal" - please know that I'm approaching this as a person who has personally GAINED by buying and consigning items with Heritage over the years - hence I'm not inclined to see it stub its toes for ANY reason. Again, I'm more concerned about transparency than abuse when it comes to Heritage. And that's mostly because of Grey. But visit the GavelSnipe site. It "feels" like it has something to hide - as if it already knows that there's ZERO benefit to be PROACTIVE with consumers - about who's "really" signing the paychecks for GavelSnipe's employees. -d.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to