Ha-ha, Rich.  In sum - I could be wrong on some of these, but as far as I know: 
 eBay doesn't own a sniping company.  Sotheby's doesn't own a sniping company.  
MoviePosterExchange.com doesn't own a sniping company.  Bonham's doesn't own a 
sniping company.  Christie's doesn't own a sniping company.  Profiles in 
History doesn't own a sniping company.  eMoviePoster doesn't own a sniping 
company.  The reasons are economic - and also because of how it would look to 
consumers, regulators and politicians.  If ONLY DEALERS have a blind spot about 
this, I'm not surprised.  Or, shoot, this could all just be a 
"specific-to-Texas" anomaly.  

Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:30:15 -0700
From: sa...@comic-art.com
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest?  Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU



There's no story here, move
along.

Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:27:52 -0700
From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest?  Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU





* My goodness, Dale, there are so many huge holes in your rebuttal that I could 
fit a freight train through each one without touching any of its sides.  But 
why bother?  In my view, you need to reboot your writing skills and come up 
with a debating strategy more substantial than, "what you're writing about is 
fire and brimstone over nothing and I personally think you just hate Heritage."

* What has Heritage done to me personally that would warrant an accusation like 
that from you, Dale Dilts, a person I know nothing about, who doesn't register 
anything on my radar at MoPo - nor do I care based solely on your inability to 
string words together in a way resembling intelligent thought?  Your note does 
suggest, however, that you're ignorant of what's been published in the business 
sections of news sites since 2008.  I've already disclosed that I've personally 
gained as a consignor and buyer of Heritage.  I think its movie poster 
department is run by an a blue-chip, top-flight guy named Grey Smith, who built 
his operation out of nothing 10 years ago.  Unlike Geraldine, I'm not a 
disgruntled Heritage client in any way.  Or maybe you, Dale Dilts, think it's 
classier to observe a "gentleman's agreement" about things that seem odd, you 
know, keep everything under the table where it belongs, and not stir up 
"trouble" - that we should all just leave things with a "wink," and as you say, 
"move on."  I hope you're not working in P.R. or in the customer relations 
operations of any company.  Because never in a million years would I hire you.  
You're poison.

* BTW, did you know that your last line, "There's no story here, move on," is 
the CLASSIC cliché rebuttal that editors mock every day in newsrooms around the 
world?  When ANY person utters it, it means there IS a story.  Didn't you get 
the memo that I've been on both sides of this ugly business - and have 
professionally handled "conflict of interest-type stories" as a news guy - and 
as a P.R. guy?  You really think a story about this - would NOT resonate with a 
news editor?  Really?  You're the one who's not thinking this through.  And I'm 
sorry, but your line, "There's no story here, move on" - sounds like famous 
last words etched on a tombstone.  You sound like Richard Nixon. -d.

Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:47:32 -0500
From: ddilts...@mchsi.com
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest? Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

OK, I tried to put these mails on auto flush, but come on stick a pin in it, 
who cares. 

Heritage is in the auction business last time I checked. Ebay allows people to 
use their API to build sniping programs because it makes bidders feel all warm 
and fuzzy making bids, so why shouldn’t Heritage pilot their own with a smaller 
user base. 

These mails have really  come across to me as you have a chip on your shoulder 
for heritage plain and simple. 

Your second point makes no sense to me at all.  Banks cannot own investment 
companies, soft drink companies cannot own a snack company. Oh my god, Disney 
owns ABC and ESPN and don’t forget…. Marvel Comics… the sky is falling. 

There is no story here, move on.
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:26:23 -0700
From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest?  Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU





Thanks, Kerry, for that bit of info below.

* Meanwhile, I'm sorry, but the word, "conspiracy" implies seamy dealings 
involving more than one person or companies gaming a system or flouting a law.  
I haven't suggested that about Heritage.  And as an ex-news guy, my litmus test 
is to demand things in writing - or to get personal testimonies backed with 
dates, numbers and other facts - not conjecture.  Every company or person, 
including Heritage, deserves that.  Kerry's sleuthing shows that Heritage 
registered the GavelSnipe domain name - but this doesn't necessarily mean it 
still owns it.

* However, whether Heritage is a "financial backer or an owner" - always 
matters in the world of business - in the same way that it matters to us that 
Bank of America owns Merrill Lynch, that PepsiCo owns Frito-Lay, that Disney 
owns ABC and ESPN, that ComCast owns NBC and that Rupert Murdoch owns the NY 
Post, Fox Sports, the WSJ and movies and shows produced or distributed by 20th 
Century Fox.  I have not suggested Heritage is breaking the law nor is running 
up bids - yet the mildly defensive responses thus far - address only that 
specific element.  I don't care about that part personally (although it is a 
salient concern) - because my experiences with Heritage have been largely 
positive.

* But I always care about transparency and proactive disclosure.  So if we say 
that "the ownership of Gavelsnipe by Heritage corporate was never hidden," what 
does that mean exactly at the level of a consumer?  Does "never hidden" mean it 
is being disclosed proactively, being disclosed upon request, "never disclosed 
officially" - or is this simply "universal common knowledge" among those "in 
the know?"  I could not find a one thing addressing this on GavelSnipe's site.  
That's odd, I thought.  It's like having a light bulb go on while I'm visiting 
a website.  I always want to know who owns or runs it.  And I was led to this 
only because of my curiosity - in relation to my praise for the 
MoviePosterExchange.com site and reading its FAQs.  MoviePosterExchange will 
use GavelSnipe as a third party service, rather than doing it by itself.  No 
conflict there.  

* I repeat:  Doesn't your objectivity get tested when you replace the word, 
"Heritage" - with the word, "Sotheby's?"  Or how about with the words, "Rupert 
Murdoch" or "Keith Olbermann?"  I think it does make a difference.  In sum, all 
of this then becomes a personal preference based on the level of trust you 
impart to a Sotheby's or a Murdoch or an Olbermann - combined with the number 
of positive experiences or relationships you have or have had with these people 
or entities.  

* Would it bother me a little if Sotheby's owned a company like GavelSnipe and 
integrated it into a timed auction?  Speaking for myself, the answer is yes.  
For Heritage, the answer is no, but I think disclosing its relationship with 
GavelSnipe is a "pre-emptive" strike to prevent others with ill intentions from 
"discovering" it on their own.  When you've got material info that may be 
controversial - my P.R. rule is to always get your message out FIRST to prevent 
being placed in a defensive position and/or losing control of a potential story 
about your brand. -d.


Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:37:44 -0700
From: loveno...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest? Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I found this ownership info, not on the Gavelsnipe.com website (I
looked thru their Terms and Conditions and FAQs--and could find
nothing about who it's corporate owner is on either page), but on a
third party site, called website.informer.com.
Heritage is stated as the owner/registrant.

Created: 2006-03-14
Expires: 2013-03-14
Owner: Heritage Auctions Registered through: GoDaddy.com, LLC
(http://www.godaddy.com)
Hosting company: PSINet, Inc
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, LLC
IPs: 38.107.251.34
DNS: ns1.gavelsniper.com
ns2.gavelsniper.com

Registrant:
Heritage Auctions
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, LLC (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: GAVELSNIPE.COM
Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.GAVELSNIPER.COM
NS2.GAVELSNIPER.COM

-Kerry

Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:20:07 -0700
From: sa...@comic-art.com
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest?  Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU



I don't recall how I found out that Heritage is a financial backer of
Gavelsnipe (which is probably more appropriate than calling them a
corporate ownership), but I've known, it's been talked about on Comic
Book forums and the like.. But I have never been worried one bit about
leaving my bids on gavelsnipe and it's easy for me to see how much money
I have saved on both ebay and Heritage auctions by looking at my snipes
and how mostly, they've never gotten close to my winning bids


then again, I'm not a conspiracist.

I know the only way for two people to keep a secret is if one of them is
dead

Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:50:53 -0700
From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest?  Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU





Rich

How did you know?  Through the site itself (which is key) - or through pals or 
by just "being in the know?"  If a consumer signs up with GavelSnipe for the 
first time today, is there a PROACTIVE disclosure in GavelSnipe's terms and 
conditions about its relationship with Heritage?  If so, it undercuts 
everything I've written and I owe everyone a big apology. -d.

Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:41:37 -0700
To: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com; MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
From: sa...@comic-art.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Potential Conflict of Interest?  Is Gavel-Snipe  owned by 
Heritage?



David


the ownership of Gavelsnipe by Heritage corporate was never hidden.. I
knew about it the day I set up my own account

Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:24:52 -0700
From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest?  Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU








I agree with Kirby too, particularly with his comment: "Any proxy bid system 
could be undermined with enough 
  'nefariousness' at work."  

Hence while I wrote my "essay" with a level of air-tightness - I was trying to 
convey less 
personal suspicion about any "nefariousness" at work by Heritage - (and 
it's only because I know and trust Grey) - but with more concern about 
the link between GavelSnipe and Heritage - and how in 
my view, it has a level of newsworthiness with the media that Heritage doesn't 
need.  Don't think
 so?  Just REPLACE Heritage's name in my "essay" below - with Sotheby's 
or Christie's or Profiles in History.  You see, your emotional reaction is 
based on 
the type of relationship and comfort level you may or may not already have with 
any auction 
house on earth.  This is really a personal preference thing with 
people, e.g., they either trust the "leash" between the two entities - or they 
don't.  I just put it out there because I know most people will read it
 - and most as a result will mull it over as another quirky element that 
riddles all hobbies, not just ours. -d. 



Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:20:39 +0200

From: i...@motionpictureart.com

Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest?  Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU










I agree with Kirby. We've been using Gavelsnipe for 
eBay for quite some time, we don't buy from Heritage, and never had any 
problems.

Ron

Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:05:48 -0500
From: ki...@movieart.net
Subject: Re: Potential Conflict of Interest?  Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I have used Gavelsnipe many times for Heritage and Ebay auctions and I have 
never had even one whiff 
of a feeling that I was being run up.  I'm glad that this service exists 
because I like the snipe process.  Ican set it and forget it.
Doesn't mean it couldn't happen if some nefarious persons wanted to pollute the 
process.  
Any proxy bid system could be undermined with enough "nefariousness" at work.
Kirby
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 02:13:00 -0700
From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
Subject: Potential Conflict of Interest?  Is Gavel-Snipe owned by Heritage?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU





* With the impending launch of Peter Contarino's, Sean Linkenback's and Ken 
Schacter's auctions (vs. fixed price sales which are there now), I've 
been visiting their MoviePosterExchange.com site.  It's easy to navigate and 
very user-friendly.  (BTW, where in the 
heck did the highly-touted $850,000 "Metropolis" 3-sheet go?  I can't 
find it!  Did it sell?)  At any rate, while visiting the site's FAQs, I read 
that it has partnered with GavelSnipe, the sniping program service, 
which will be available to bidders for timed auctions.  That's good 
news.  

* But what's interesting - and this has nothing to do with 
MoviePosterExchange.com - is GavelSnipe "appears" to be owned by Heritage.  If 
I'm wrong, please correct me - and a thousand apologies if I am.  I'm 
less concerned about potential abuses like shilling and what not with 
Heritage's auctions - than I am about transparency.  
GavelSnipe's murky origins are troubling.  I couldn't find much info 
about who owns or runs it.  This is NOT a criticism of 
Grey - who I consider a pal.  The issue of GavelSnipe's ownership - if 
indeed Heritage is its "owner" - is out of his hands.  It's bigger than 
him because it's available to bidders in Heritage's other departments.

* If true, this is NOT like PayPal being 
owned by eBay.  It's more like GavelSnipe being owned by Sotheby's or 
Christie's, e.g., a conflict 
of interest where potential abuses "could" occur - despite

 assurances that a "sniping subsidiary" of Sotheby's or Christie's - can 
operate independently - with an iron-clad ability to preserve the 
confidentiality of all scheduled "snipe" bids submitted online.  Do you trust 
this, given what you've read in the news about Sotheby's, Christie's, price 
fixing, Wall Street buddies in bed with politicians trading stocks with 
confidential info, etc.?  

* By using 
ANY sniping program, you are imparting the same trust you already give to 
auction sites when submitting "absentee bids" for "live" showroom sales. 
 The difference is you can't be "run-up" while using a sniping program, 
or so you think, because your bids are placed in the last few seconds of a
 timed sale.  But what if the wall protecting "sniped bids" is 
breached by another department in the SAME building?  Here's what I know:  
GavelSnipe is based in Dallas and "uses SSL encryption (so that) your passwords 
are secured and not VIEWABLE by GavelSnipe personnel."  I have no reason to 
distrust this.  But what about actual snipe bid amounts before a sale closes?  
In the effort to make "sniping" available for 
clients like myself who've clamored for it - I hope Heritage hasn't errantly 
opened a can of worms 
by OWNING GavelSnipe - instead of PARTNERING with an 
independently-run third party company - such as JustSnipe or others like it.

* Before most of you scoff and dismiss what I'm saying as "manufactured 
paranoia" or "no big deal" - please know that I'm approaching 
this as a 
person who has personally GAINED by buying and 
consigning items with Heritage over the years - hence I'm not inclined 
to see it stub its toes for ANY reason.  Again, I'm
 more concerned about transparency than abuse when it comes to Heritage.  And 
that's mostly because of Grey.  But visit the GavelSnipe site.  It "feels" like 
it has something to
 hide - as if it already knows that there's ZERO benefit 
to be PROACTIVE with consumers - about who's "really" signing the paychecks for 
GavelSnipe's employees. -d.                                       
         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to