> woods: > You could have an moq social organization, this forum is one. It's > about > people wanting to join in freedom, not by force, that's all. That's Platt > argument > and I know he's correct on that point. I think I'm actually getting used > to Platt. > I used to have a very rough time with him. Now I think Platt is putting > out > comments to see where your coming from. If you talk about social > organization, then > Platt may ask or say don't force this on people - meaning, it's good as > long as > people freely partake, not by the point of the gun. Of course other > points can > be made, but we learn and find out were we are each coming from. Also, at > times, > a little side-stepping a topic that we don't agree with and seeing how it > plays out on > the forum helps too at times. Then we can dive in when we think we have a > better > grasp as to where people are coming from. Discuss until you know for sure > that > what the other person is saying is truly what you think they are saying. > I would > say that's good advice, not just for you or anybody else on this forum, > but for > me too. > Does that sound about right Platt?
Sounds right to me. Also, your comments about lack of adherence to the law in the U.S. is correct -- immigration laws being an obvious case in point, although official encouragement to ignore election laws is currently getting a lot of play. Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
