On 2004-03-08, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Lefevre wrote: > >>>>It allows us to give access only to a list of people. That's good >>>>enough to start with. Let's not get too fancy yet. >>> >>>The problem is that, if we want to get fancier, we have to write all the >>>code ourselves. Which means it'll probably never happen. >> >> True, on the other hand, if it's decided to investigate and implement >> something else, the whole project will probably never happen. > > Why does that have to be true?
It doesn't have to be true. I'm just guessing it'd probably happen. > The key metric is how quickly it gets finished, not how quickly it gets > started. True (although I'm not sure what "finished" would mean in this context. However, how quickly it gets started obviously has an impact on that "key metric" as well. [snip] >> But again, if we decide to start looking, we'll be arguing about different >> systems (no doubt, clouded by much discussion of the Zope incident) for >> months. > > Again, why does that have to be true? It doesn't have to be true. If the investigating and decision can happen within a set deadline so we don't hold things up indefinitely, that would be good. Call me a pessimist, but I'm predicting that that won't happen even if it is tried, so I don't see much point in trying it. But I'm not running anything here; I'm not even sure I can contribute much to this project, so you don't have to listen to me :) -- Michael _______________________________________________ mozilla-documentation mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation
