Björn Krombholz wrote: >On 1/4/06, Tarragon M. Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Do we need to be so strict about this? >> >>I think having EU as an option when it's uncertain exactly which country the >>release was in, or for those releases that do in fact say "EU" on them, >>should be acceptable. It can be treated as a slightly more exact "[unknown]" >>style for release locations. If someone knows better they can change it. >> >> > >I doubt this will work, because people didn't request EU for unknown >EU releases but releases which appeared in _some_ EU countries on the >same day. > >Further, I don't think we need a hidden "unknown". We should stick >with correct information. If someone doesn't know the release country, >he must not add neither some random country nor an unknown EU region. >And another one probably knows this fact (someone always does) and is >able to add it. > > > The problem I currently have: * A release year is known - but not the country. The current situation don't allows me to enter this. * A release country is known - but not the correct year. The current situation don't allows me to enter this. * I can't enter the correct - from the label owners on my request given - data (in this case release country "Europe" / "EU") * finally the only solution for me is *now*: I don't enter anything, cause I will not enter wrong data
Is this the basis of a reliable database? I don't think so. Schika _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
