On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:32 AM, symphonick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only real showstopper for me so far for this system is if we have > to create a new "work" every time a work is split in more than one > track (4th mvt of Beethoven's 9 and similar) . Sounds like a big mess > to me. (& then there's this problem with identical releases in > different languages and/or different packaging & how to deal with that > without turning into discogs...) > I don't think so; I thought what we'd be doing was to link (via a pending AR type) each track on the CD to the single 4th movement of Symphony No. 9, so both would be "This track is an instance/recording/whatever-word-we-decide-on of 'Symphony No. 9 in D minor: IV. Presto assai' (or whatever the full title is, I don't know offhand). The *tracknames* would still be a little kludgy--if the process is still copying names from the CSGS or similar--but they should get the work/movement's name correct.
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
